Legal Opinion

Bevilacqua v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 3, 2025No. 2:20-cv-01617Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 9 ANGELA M BEVILACQUA, Case No. 2:20-cv-1617-RSM 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 11 MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES v. PURSANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 12 13 COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 14 Defendant. 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees under 42 16 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. #28. Plaintiff seeks fees in the net amount of $22,533.75 out of 17 18 $146,182.00 in past due benefits. See Dkt. #28-1. This accounts for a previous Equal Access to 19 Justice Act (“EAJA”) fee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. In the Matter of Anne PilsburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. Frost v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API