Legal Opinion

Blalock v. City of Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1956No. 679PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The death certificate signed by Dr. R. A. Hartón, the coroner, was introduced in evidence by the plaintiffs. The cause of death was given as (a) cardiac arrest; (b) due to shock by static electricity; (c) contact with high tension wire. Dr. Hartón testified as a witness and on cross-examination stated that no autopsy was performed; that no burns appeared on the body of the employee; and that he found nothing to indicate cause of death other than statements by those present at the time of death and the fact that the body was lying near a sagging power wire. He testified further that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Gabriel v. Town of NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Tindall v. American Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Gant v. CrouchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Creighton v. . SnipesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Robinson v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Branch v. DempseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Jacobs v. PENDELNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Campbell v. North Carolina State Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API