Legal Opinion

Campbell v. North Carolina State Board of Alcoholic Control

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1964PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The petitioner’s counsel entered numerous objections to the admission of testimony before the hearing officer. Some of these objections would have merit in a court proceeding. For example: after the girl testified in detail about the purchase of the beer, her companion was permitted to corroborate her by saying she had heard that testimony and it was in accordance with her recollection. However, the rules of evidence before administrative boards permit more latitude than is customary in court proceedings. This Court has held that if there is any competent evidence to support a finding of fact…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blalock v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Boyd v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Gant v. CrouchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. National Food Stores v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Underwood v. State Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Matter of LeggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Matter of ElkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API