Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. PENDEL
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 15, 1967PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
98 N.J. Super. 252 (1967)
236 A.2d 888
BERTHA JACOBS AND HARRY JACOBS, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ELMER A. PENDEL, DEFENDANT BELOW,
v.
RUTH N. MILLER AND PLEDGE MILLER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, KISSELMAN, DEVINE, DEIGHAN & MONTANO, INTERVENING APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 27, 1967.
Decided December 15, 1967.
Before Judges KILKENNY, CARTON and HORN.
Mr. Neil F. Deighan, Jr. for intervening-appellants (Messrs. Kisselman, Devine, Deighan & Montano, attorneys, pro se).
No one appeared in behalf of defendants-respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by HORN,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allegro v. Afton Village Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Spickerman v. GoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Blalock v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Fairchild v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1965
- Fessler v. WeissAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Brundage v. Estate of CarambioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Passanante v. YormarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Kriegsman v. KriegsmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.