Industrial Commission v. Link
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
There are two major questions presented by this record: (1) The jurisdictional question raised by the claim of the plaintiff in error that there never has been a denial of Lint’s right to participate in the state insurance fund upon grounds going to the basis of his claim; (2) that the court of common pleas erred in admitting in evidence, over the objection of the commission, certain portions of the record made before the Industrial Commission, and certified to the court of common pleas.
As to the jurisdiction question, it is the claim of .the commission that, in view of the fact that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hile v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Industrial Commission v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Fisher Body Co. v. ChefloOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Industrial Commission v. HilshorstOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Industrial Commission v. LinkOhio Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Noggle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Rummel v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Ferguson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Industrial Comm. v. MeiningerOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
- Puttman v. Industrial Commission, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1931