Industrial Comm. v. Meininger
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJustice, J.
Two claims of error are presented: first, decisions and judgments are not sustained by sufficient evidence; second, decisions and judgments are contrary to law.
In . order to dispose of the first claimed error we were required to, and have, read both records. They disclose that Meinninger’s left foot was caught and crushed between two clay cars, and that Stark’s left leg was caught and crushed between two coal cars. Both men sustained very serious injuries, which have greatly impaired their earning capacity. They are young men, and prior to the receipt of their injuries, were able bodied. It…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hile v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Industrial Commission v. LinkOhio Supreme Court · 1930