Connecticut National Bank v. Cooper

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly refused to open the stipulated judgments that had been rendered against the defendants Southbury Affiliates, Limited Partner*407ship (partnership), and Mark Cooper, a limited partner in that partnership, in the absence of the consent of the partnership’s limited partners. The plaintiff, Connecticut National Bank, now known as Shawmut Bank (bank), had filed three separate complaints against Cooper demanding payment on nineteen defaulted promissory notes.1 Each complaint also contained one count of fraudulent conveyance…