Legal Opinion

Foreman v. VER BURGGHEN

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1965No. 4800PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

This appeal from a judgment on a directed verdict for the defendant physician in a malpractice suit seeks to have us overrule our former holding in support of the “locality rule” in Lockhart v. Maclean, 77 Nev. 210, 361 P.2d 670. This we decline to do for the reasons stated in that case. The trial court’s direction for a verdict for defendant was based on that decision. In this there was no error. NRCP 50.

It is true that the first concurring opinion in that case stated that it “should not be taken as precluding us, in a proper case in the future, from re-examining…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alamo Airways, Inc. v. BenumNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Lockart v. MacLeanNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Charleston Hill National Mines, Inc. v. CloughNevada Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Prabhu v. LevineNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Orcutt v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Burgeon v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bronneke v. RutherfordNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Bakerink v. Orthopaedic Associates, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API