Legal Opinion

Bronneke v. Rutherford

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2004No. 40222PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant David Bronneke appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. Bronneke, a carpenter in his mid-forties at the time of trial, had undergone numerous chiropractic treatments over several years. However, on June 27, 2001, Bronneke suffered a stroke immediately after respondent Dr. Martin Rutherford, a chiropractor, had performed a chiropractic treatment upon Bronneke. Dr. Rutherford had performed a long axis traction technique in which Bronneke had lain faceup on a table; Dr. Rutherford had extended Bronneke’s neck, and then, using a rolled-up gown,…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Roberson v. CounselmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lioce v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Staccato v. Valley HospitalNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Patrick McLeod NissleyArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Lioce v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Bahena v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API