Bronneke v. Rutherford
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant David Bronneke appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. Bronneke, a carpenter in his mid-forties at the time of trial, had undergone numerous chiropractic treatments over several years. However, on June 27, 2001, Bronneke suffered a stroke immediately after respondent Dr. Martin Rutherford, a chiropractor, had performed a chiropractic treatment upon Bronneke. Dr. Rutherford had performed a long axis traction technique in which Bronneke had lain faceup on a table; Dr. Rutherford had extended Bronneke’s neck, and then, using a rolled-up gown,…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Roberson v. CounselmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Lioce v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Staccato v. Valley HospitalNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Patrick McLeod NissleyArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Lioce v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Bahena v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.