Legal Opinion
Sigler v. Inter-River Drainage District
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 22, 1925PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment obtained by the plaintiffs in this case was affirmed by the Springfield Court of Appeals (257 S.W. 487); but that court, stating there was substantial ground for holding that its decision was in conflict with the decision of the Kansas City Court of Appeals in Arnold v. Worth County Drainage District,209 Mo. App. 220, certified the cause to this court.
The case is one originally assigned to Judge WOODSON, and re-assigned since his death. The suit of the plaintiffs, the owner of the land, and a crop tenant, is for damage done to their crops in the year 1919, and caused by an…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- Jackson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Lamb v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1887
- Abbott v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Bradbury v. Vandalia Levee & Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Page v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Keener v. SharpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Hill-Behan Lumber Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- City of Hardin v. Norborne Land Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Bohannon v. Camden Bend Drainage DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.