Bohannon v. Camden Bend Drainage District
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.
This action is brought to enjoin respondents from constructing and maintaining a ditch, and from lowering the level of a private lake, or otherwise interfering with appellants’ property, and from carrying out a certain plan of reclamation. Defendants, respondents here, filed a motion to dismiss said action on the ground that the petition did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against defendants, and failed to state a claim upon which any relief may be granted. The motion was sustained by the trial court. From the judgment thereupon rendered in defendants’ favor,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rude v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Mound City Land & Stock Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- Morrison v. MoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Richards Brick Co. v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
- Anderson v. Inter-River Drainage & Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Page v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Kleban v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Millhouse v. Drainage District No. 48 of Dunklin CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Kansas City v. MathisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage District of Holt CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.