Legal Opinion
SAIF Corp. v. Paxton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 10, 1998No. WCB 95-00537, 94-13809, 94-10357; CA A93939PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
SAIF and Sun Studs, Inc. (Sun Studs) seek reversal of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that concluded that Sun Studs is the responsible employer for claimant’s hearing loss. Compensability is not an issue in this case. Rather, the only issue is whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s finding that Sun Studs is the responsible employer. ORS 183.482(8). We reverse.
The Board found the following facts. From 1977 to January 1981, claimant worked for Woolley Enterprises (Woolley). From January 1981 to October 1991, he worked for RLC Industries (RLC).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Roseburg Forest Products v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- FMC Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- FMC Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kenimer v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Armenta v. PCC Structural, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Liberty Northwest Insurance v. KaletaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- RLC Industries v. Sun Studs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Fred Meyer, Inc. v. SamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004