Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Town of Endicott
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 2, 1923No. 17360PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
The parties to this action entered into,
“This Agreement made . . . this 26th. day of July, 1920, between the Town of Endicott, "Washington, a municipal corporation hereinafter known as the first party, and Charles Johnson, hereinafter known as the second party, Witnesseth:
“That the first party for and in consideration of the promises and agreements of the second party herein contained, does by these presents employ the second party to superintend the construction of the improvement in local improvement district No. 2, and agrees to pay the said second party for his services and the furnishing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Postel v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Jurey v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Giuricevic v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- International Contract Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Wolpers v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Puget Construction Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- City of Longview v. Longview Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
- Old National Bank v. Lewis CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Perkins v. City of South BendWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Boyer v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.