Legal Opinion

Perkins v. City of South Bend

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1925No. 18892. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought against the defendant, a city of the third class, to recover the amount of a number of local improvement warrants, on the ground that the city had wrongfully paid warrants of subsequent issue and higher denomination than those held by the plaintiff. It is claimed that, if the subsequent warrants had not been paid, there would have been sufficient in the funds to have taken care of those held by the plaintiff as well as those which had priority over his warrants. The warrants in question were first issued and delivered to contractors who had done street improvement work…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. German-American Savings Bank v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State ex rel. American Freehold-Land Mortgage Co. of London v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Quaker City National Bank v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Jurey v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Baer v. ChoirWashington Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Earle v. Froedtert Grain & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Puget Construction Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. City of Longview v. Longview Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Rand v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Amende v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API