Legal Opinion

Wolpers v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1912No. 9726PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Clifford, J., entered March 15, 1911, dismissing an action in tort, upon, sustaining objections to the introduction of any evidence.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

Action by the appellant against the respondent for damages because of personal injuries sustained by the appellant while in the employ of the city as a carpenter. It is alleged that, while he was at work upon a false arch which the city had erected as a form for a concrete arch of a bridge which was in process of construction across the Spokane river, at Monroe street, in Spokane, the false arch collapsed and fell, precipitating the appellant upon the rocks in the river below, permanently injuring him. The negligence alleged was carelessness in the construction of the false arch, failure *634to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Postel v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Giuricevic v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Kelly v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ransom v. City of South BendWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. International Contract Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State v. ColumbusWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Maggs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Haynes v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API