Legal Opinion
Detroit Edison Co. v. Southeastern Michigan Transportation Authority
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1987No. Docket 88462PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order denying its motion for summary disposition and granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10). We affirm.
This case arises out of defendant’s construction of the Central Automated Transit System (cats), commonly known as the downtown Detroit People Mover. Before construction began, it was determined that certain of plaintiff’s utility facilities were located on or under public streets within the projected route of cats, and would have to be relocated, removed, or abandoned. Plaintiff was willing to relocate its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Borski v. City of WakefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Detroit Edison Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Center Line v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Taylor v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
- City & County of Denver v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Northern States Power Co. v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Detroit Edison Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- City of Taylor v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.