Legal Opinion

City of Taylor v. Detroit Edison Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2006No. Docket 127580PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

We granted leave to appeal in this case to reconcile plaintiffs constitutional authority to exercise “reasonable control” over its streets with the Michigan Public Service Commission’s (MPSC) broad regulatory control over public utilities. Consistent with our longstanding precedent, we hold that a municipality’s exercise of “reasonable control” over its streets cannot impinge on matters of statewide concern nor can a municipality regulate in a manner inconsistent with state law. In this case, the MPSC has promulgated uniform rules governing the relocation of utility wires underground. To the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wayne County v. HathcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Rinaldo's Construction Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Travelers Insurance v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. BuieMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Fluor Enterprises, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API