Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hill

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 24, 1889PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Brill, J., without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

This is an action brought to rescind a contract by which the plaintiffs purchased from the defendants Hill and Browne certain shares in the capital stock of the defendant the Clyde Coal Company, a corporation formed for the purpose of mining coal in certain lands in the state of Iowa, to recover the money paid upon the purchase, and secure the delivery to plaintiffs of promissory notes executed by them for part of the purchase price. The ground upon which such rescission is sought is that, to induce them to make the purchase, the defendants Hill and Browne made to plaintiffs certain false…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sloan v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Peine v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  3. MacLaren v. CochranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Ludowese v. AmidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Pennington v. RobergeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API