Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Woodell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1985No. 493PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Arthur P. Smith, III, was charged with an attempt to commit the theft of an automobile; and Daniel L. Woodell, Jr., was charged with firearms and prohibited weapons offenses. Immediately prior to trial, the court heard omnibus pre-trial motions which had been filed by both defendants. At that pre-trial hearing, during cross-examination of police officers, it became apparent that a “prosecution report” had been prepared by police and contained discoverable information not previously disclosed by the Commonwealth. The court found the failure to disclose the information in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. BonacursoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. GilesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. HudgensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. People v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. WardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API