Commonwealth v. Gordon
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
We have this appeal on remand from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. In Commonwealth v. Gordon, 342 Pa.Super. 480, 493 A.2d 691 (1985), rev’d, 511 Pa. 481, 515 A.2d 558 (1986), we found insufficient evidence to support appellant’s convictions for possession and delivery of a controlled substance, holding that appellant’s status as a licensed and registered pharmacist exempted him from prosecution under clauses (16) and (30) of section 13(a) of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(16), (30). We found that the provision of the Act applicable to appellant’s…
2Cases cited112 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. GravelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. ThurSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. RyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. BadmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.