Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hudgens

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1990No. 00162PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered following appellant’s convictions for simple assault, 1 reckless endangerment, 2 terroristic threats, 3 and possession of an instrument of crime. 4

Appellant presents the following issues for our review: (1) whether the evidence was insufficient to establish that the victim was in fear of imminent serious bodily injury; (2) whether the evidence was insufficient to establish that the victim was threatened; (3) whether the evidence was insufficient to support appellant’s conviction for possession of an instrument of crime; (4)…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. United States v. Starusko, JohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. HunterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. TizerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Singh v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. FentonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API