Legal Opinion
Murrill v. State Board of Accountancy
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 24, 1950No. Civ. 17263PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel the State Board of Accountancy to set aside and rescind its order revolting his license to practice public accountancy.
On June 16, 1947, in the United States District Court at Los Angeles, petitioner entered a plea of guilty to charges of violating section 145(a) of title 26, U.S.C.A., to wit: “failure to supply information for the assessment of income tax” in connection with returns therefor made by him for certain of his clients for the year 1944. He was sentenced to one year’s imprisonment on each of two counts, such sentences to run…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Watson v. MercerSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Redwood Gym v. Salt Lake County CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Frankel v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Beamon v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.