Legal Opinion
Geiss v. Bourassa
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 7, 1996No. 94-363PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The plaintiffs, Arthur A. and Shirley E. Geiss, appeal the Superior Court (Brennan, J.) denial of their petition for permanent injunctive relief. We affirm in part and remand.
This action arises out of the operation of a waste disposal business, defendant Ken’s Waste Disposal, Inc. (Ken’s), in Westmoreland. Defendant Claire B. Bourassa owns Ken’s. Bourassa’s purchase of the property in 1989 was contingent upon her receiving town permission to operate Ken’s on the property, *630“including, without limitation, storage of trucks, rolloffs, containers (dumpsters) and the maintenance of those trucks…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New London v. LeskiewiczSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- New London Land Use Ass'n v. New London Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Taylor v. Davidson Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Magrauth v. MagrauthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Perron v. City of SomersworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cook v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Massicotte v. MatuzasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- 1808 Corp. v. Town of New IpswichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Cormier v. Town of Danville Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- Neumann v. Village of Winnipesaukee Timeshare Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.