Legal Opinion

Massicotte v. Matuzas

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 8, 1999No. 96-750PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The defendant, Anthony James Matuzas, appeals from a Superior Court (Murphy, J.) decision imposing a constructive trust on his interest in certain real property in favor of the plaintiff, Josephine B. Massicotte. We vacate and remand.

After a trial on the merits, the court found the following facts. The property at issue is located in Nashua and was purchased in 1965 by the plaintiff and her then husband, Peter K. Matuzas, Sr. In 1974, by divorce decree, the plaintiff was awarded exclusive title to the property. The plaintiff has three children from the marriage, including the defendant. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Arnold v. ChandlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Archer v. DowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  4. Dubois v. DuboisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. Geiss v. BourassaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New Hampshire Department of Corrections v. ButlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. Matter of LemieuxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. In re HallerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. DeMauro v. DeMauroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. Gutbier v. Hannaford Bros.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API