Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. Gea Associates

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 14, 2004No. 03-1806PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEDEMEYER, EJ.

¶ 1. Metropolitan Ventures, LLC appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of GEA Associates, Elizabeth Levins and Margaret Reuss, dismissing Metropolitan's complaint alleging that GEA Associates breached its contractual, legal and ethical duties. Metropolitan asserts that the trial court erred in ruling that no valid contract existed based on Nodolf v. Nelson, 103 Wis. 2d 656, 309 N.W.2d 397 (Ct. App. 1981), which held that the absence of specific financing terms rendered the contract illusory. Because the financing contingency did…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Nelsen v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Gerruth Realty Co. v. PireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Kovarik v. VeselyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA AssociatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA ASSOCIATESWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA ASSOCIATESWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA AssociatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA AssociatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API