Gerruth Realty Co. v. Pire
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
Contracts of purchase or offers to purchase containing “subject to financing” clauses are fairly common and the clauses have been construed frequently as constituting a condition precedent to the buyer’s performance. The initial question in reference to such a contract is whether it is definite enough to be sustained or, if indefinite, whether it may be given a meaning which renders the contract certain. Courts are not inclined to strike down such a contract for uncertainty if the deficiency can be supplied consistent with reasonableness in the interest of preserving the contract which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Inglis v. FoheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Kovarik v. VeselyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Locke v. BortWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Kelley v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- George v. OswaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wiggins v. ShewmakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Kernz v. J. L. French Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA AssociatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Nodolf v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Lien v. PittsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.