Legal Opinion

Kovarik v. Vesely

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1958PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

On this appeal we accept the learned trial court’s finding that the stipulation entered into by the buyers’ *579counsel, which set forth the mortgage terms, was intended to state the terms of the mortgage-loan application which had been filed by the buyers with the Fort Atkinson Savings & Loan Association. It is unfortunate that the discussion, which took place between counsel and the court leading up to the stating of such stipulation on the record, was not also made part of the record. Standing alone the stipulation is ambiguous, and in such a situation we deem that the trial judge has a right…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. American Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls v. HaggertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Long Investment Co. v. O'DONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Kelly v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Kenner v. Edwards Realty & Finance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Martinson v. Brooks Equipment Leasing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Proctor v. HoldenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Bunbury v. KraussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Gerruth Realty Co. v. PireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Locke v. BortWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API