Rugg v. Hoover
Supreme Court of Minnesota
■ Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Pólk county, Stearns, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
This action was brought to enforce a mechanic’s lien for mill supplies and machinery furnished by the plaintiff for the construction and repair of a mill. The complaint alleges that in October, 1878, the plaintiff, by virtue of a contract with the defend*405ant Hoover, sold and delivered to him certain mill supplies, machinery and materials, for the construction and repair of a saw and flouring-mill, situated on lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, in block 38, and a fractional lot between said block and the Bed Lake river, in the town-site of Crookston, in Polk county; that Hoover was, at the time of the making…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Meyer v. BerlandiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Parker v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Malter v. Falcon Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1883
- Wyman v. QuayleWyoming Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. ArthurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.