State Bank v. Heney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Stearns, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, interposed by the defendants James D. Ray apd John R. Carey, the sureties in the bond sued on.
1Opinion of the Court
Dickinson, J.1
The legislative act of incorporation of the city of Duluth (Sp. Laws, 1887, e. 2, sube. 5, § 5) requires that, upon the awarding of a contract by the city for (among other things) the grading of streets, the contractor “shall furnish to the city of Duluth a bond, with sufficient sureties, * * * conditioned that he shall execute the work for the price mentioned in his bid, and according to the plans and specifications; and said bond shall contain a further condition that he shall pay for all labor done and materials furnished upon said improvement; and the contract to be executed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allen v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Leighton v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- City of St. Paul v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Morton v. PowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Griffin v. ChadbourneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- Breen v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Ihk v. Duluth CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Tompkins v. ForrestalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Waterous Engine Works Co. v. Village of ClintonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.