Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Christenson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1913No. 18,394PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Cloud district court; John C. Hogin, judge.

1Per curiam

Was there error in striking out the ■amended and supplemental answer filed by appellant? He rented a farm from appellee on which stock was to be kept. Each party was to furnish certain things and bear a proportion, of the expense. The increase of ■stock and the profits made were to be divided on a stipulated basis. A dispute arose between them, and appellee sued to recover money alleged to be wrongfully withheld by appellant and caused his property to be seized on attachment. An answer was filed by appellant, alleging that he had complied with the conditions of the lease, asking for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reihl v. LikowskiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Jockers v. BorgmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Garanflo v. CooleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Rosa v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  5. Bank of Santa Fé v. Haskell County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miles v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Harmon v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. First National Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Georgian Co. v. KinneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Atkinson v. WiardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API