Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Wiard

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1941No. 34,994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action for personal injuries. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

A decision on the main point raised by defendants requires a discussion of what happened at a former trial. The petition alleged that plaintiff was injured while riding in a merry-go-round operated by defendants; that this device was of a type where the passengers sit in seats constructed to resemble airplanes attached to steel poles, the other ends of which were attached to the top of another pole, and when the force was applied the whole device whirled…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mayes v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Miles v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Pugh v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Harmon v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Posey v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Gant v. Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Dickey v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. Martin v. King Riding Device Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API