Jockers v. Borgman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Washington District Court. Action brought by Mary Borgman against Charles lookers, under §10, chapter 35, Compiled Laws of 1879. At the November Term, 1881, of the district court, the plaintiff recovered a judgment for $1,000 actual damages, and $400 exemplary damages, against the defendant for having caused the intoxication of her husband. Defendant brings the case to this court. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This was an action brought under the 10 th section of the dramshop act, (ch. 35, Comp. Laws 1879,) in which the defendant in' error (plaintiff below) recovered ajudgment.of $1,000 actual damages, and $400 exemplary damages against the plaintiff in error, for having caused the intoxication of her husband.
I. It is alleged the court erred in overruling the motion to make more specific and certain the allegations of the petition as to the second, third, fourth and sixth grounds therein. It appears from the record that the petition was filed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gilleland v. SchuylerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Wiley v. KeokukSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Hackett v. SmelsleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Meidel v. AnthisIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Dillon v. LinderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- H.N. Dang v. Gilbert CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Forrester v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Lane v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Carrick v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Nelson v. Restaurants of Iowa, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.