Legal Opinion

Segura v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2001No. 10S01-0009-PC-515PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

Jose Daniel Segura pleaded guilty to dealing in cocaine. He appeals the denial of his successive petition for postconviction relief, raising one issue: whether his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him of the possibility of deportation if he pleaded guilty. In State v. Van Cleave, 674 N.E.2d 1293, 1306 (Ind.1996), we held that in order to upset a conviction based on a claim of ineffective assistance of coun*499sel, a petitioner who pleads guilty must show a reasonable probability that he would not have been convicted if he had gone to trial.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Helton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Graham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Willoughby v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Juan Manzano v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API