Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Fretwell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 25, 1993No. 91-1393PublishedCited by 3,303 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

In this case we decide whether counsel’s failure to make an objection in a state criminal sentencing proceeding — an objection that would have been supported by a decision which subsequently was overruled — constitutes “prejudice” within the meaning of our decision in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668 (1984). Because the result of the sentencing proceeding in this case was rendered neither unreliable nor fundamentally unfair as a result of counsel’s failure to make the objection, we answer the question in the negative. To hold otherwise would grant criminal defendants a windfall to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3,303 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Leslie Wayne Yohey v. James A. Collins, Director Department of Criminal Justice Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998

3,298 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API