Legal Opinion

Shillitani v. Valentine

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

Contested mandamus proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for a final order to compel the restoration of telephone service to the petitioner at his apartment residence which is occupied by his family and himself. The petitioner is a restaurateur and is also a real estate operator; he was previously engaged for some twenty years in the laundry business; so far as the record discloses he is a respectable individual.

The telephone has been used in the customary manner in which it is used in the home except that the petitioner, an ardent bettor on horse races, used it frequently for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BrophyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Pennsylvania Publications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Godwin v. Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Bamman v. EricksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. People ex rel. Restmeyer v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pike v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Rubin v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Pike v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Pike v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API