People ex rel. Restmeyer v. New York Telephone Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The New York Telephone Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 28th day of February, 1916, granting relator’s motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, J.:
This is an appeal from an order directing the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the New York Telephone Company to place one of its telephone instruments, fully equipped for use, in the relator’s premises, No. 224 Washington street, New York city, and to allow the relator the customary use thereof upon payment of the usual charges and compliance with the rules and regulations of the company.
The relator is engaged in the liquor business at 224 Washington street. On January 28, 1916, the telephone company *133removed the telephone from his saloon upon a complaint of the…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Sokol v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Telephone News System, Inc. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
- Pennsylvania Publications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Pennsylvania Publications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Figari v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.