Pike v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentGoodwyn, Justice
Appellant, plaintiff below, brought action at law against appellee claiming damages for cutting off or discontinuing her telephone service. As last amended, the complaint consisted of three counts. Count 1 charged appellee with “negligently” cutting off telephone service; count 2, with “wantonly” cutting off such service; and count 3, with “willfully, wantonly, maliciously, intentionally, and wrongfully” cutting off such service. Appellee’s demurrer to the complaint, as last amended, was overruled. Thereupon appellee entered two pleas. The first was a plea of the general issue. Plea 2 was as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. BrophyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- McBride v. Western Union Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Andrews v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1949
- People ex rel. Restmeyer v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- King v. SeamonSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.