Legal Opinion
Zielinski v. Kotsoris
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 8, 2006No. SC 17441PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
In this appeal, we consider whether the continuous treatment doctrine or the continuing coruse of conduct doctrine tolls the statute of limitations in a medical malpractice case when the plaintiffs condition is subsequently diagnosed or treated by a different physician employed by the same corporate entity that had employed the defendant physician at the time of the alleged negligence. The named plaintiff, Shelley Zielinski, brought this medical malpractice action 1 against the defendants, Harriet Kotsoris, 2 Kris-tan D. Zimmerman, Stamford Radiological Associates, P.C.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Karaduman v. Newsday, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Alvarez v. New Haven Register, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ramirez v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Martinelli v. FusiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Grey v. Stamford Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Episcopal Church in Diocese of Connecticut v. GaussSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Bednarz v. Eye Physicians of Central Connecticut, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.