Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Jensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1921No. 3540PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, First District, Bos Elder County; J. D. Call, Judge. Action by Joseph H. Watkins against Sylvester Jensen and others. From judgment dismissing the case, ■ plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

*15In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover the possesion or value of a certain animal described in the complaint. The usual allegations of possession on a date named, ownership, right of possession in plaintiff on said date, as well as on the date of the commencement of the action, are contained in the complaint. Plaintiff further alleges wrongful taking and detention by defendants, as well as the value of the property in question. The answer is a general denial. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony the defendants separately interposed motions for nonsuit. No serious objection was made to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riker v. HooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  2. Clark v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Nielsen v. HylandUtah Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Petty v. BorgUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Petty v. BorgUtah Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API