State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Murphy
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hallett
Joseph Picchi, one of four persons injured in a three-car collision, seeks to hold the State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company liable either on a $100,000 per accident policy which it had issued to the driver at fault (although it had paid out the limits of that policy to other claimants) or under the “uninsured motorist” coverage in his father’s policy. The lower court ruled that the insurer had no obligation to him under either policy. We agree and affirm.
There is no dispute as to the facts in this case. On July 19,1970, Timothy Murphy, while driving, was involved in a three-car…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ullman v. Wolverine InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- EARLY SETTLERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. SchweidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Smiley v. Estate of ToneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Kemp v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Golphin v. Home Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. SorianoTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Western States Insurance v. O'HaraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Samack v. Travelers Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Ripley Resin Engineering Co. v. Great American InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.