Legal Opinion

Samack v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 14, 1982No. 81-2898PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the circuit court granting defendant’s motion to dismiss her amended complaint for declaratory judgment and damages. She raises as issues whether Florida’s no-fault insurance statute precludes her from suing the driver of the car that struck the car in which she was riding; and, if it does, whether she is entitled to compensation from her own insurance company, defendant Travelers Insurance Co. (Travelers), under the uninsured motorist provision of her policy with them.

For the reasons which follow, we reverse and remand with directions.

The amended complaint…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kravis v. Smith Marine, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Barnes v. PowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Doxtater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. Gendron v. Calvert Fire Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Smiley v. Estate of ToneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Scudella v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Blais v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  3. State Farm Automobile Insurance v. OvitzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Coronet Insurance Co. v. FerrillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Comet Casualty Co. v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API