Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 28, 1973No. 4665PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLOUD, Chief Justice.

This is a case of first impression in Texas. Appellants, William Kemp and wife, Ruby Kemp, Garrett Bell and Clyde Wayne Bell, contend they are entitled to recover from their respective uninsured motorist insurers the difference between their actual recovery from a third-party tort-feasor, who carried the statutory minimum limits of liability insurance, and the $10,000.00 per person limits provided in their respective policies.

All parties filed motions for summary judgment. The motions of appellees, Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Fireman’s Fund American…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simmons v. ArnimTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Railroad Commission of Texas v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. American Liberty Insurance Company v. RanzauTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Detrick v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Brake v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Strunk v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Francis v. International Service Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Kemp v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lund v. Mission Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API