Attorney General v. Public Service Commission
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The issue before this Court is whether the Michigan Public Service Commission (psc) can “approve” a long-term purchase of electric capacity from Ontario Hydro without conducting a contested case proceeding under MCL 460.6j; MSA 22.13(6j) or MCL 460.6a; MSA 22.13(6a). We conclude that the PSC could so proceed in this case, and we affirm the PSC’s October 25, 1995, order in Public Service Commission Case No. U-10939 authorizing Detroit Edison to recover from its customers the costs associated with its purchase of the capacity from Ontario Hydro.
Detroit Edison has an ownership interest in a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Drouillard v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re Estes EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Telephone Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neal v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Atty. Gen. v. PscMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Neal v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998