Legal Opinion

Neal v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 1998No. Docket 198616Published

1Opinion of the Court

583 N.W.2d 249 (1998)

230 Mich. App. 202

Tracy NEAL, Helen Gibbs, Stacy Barker, Ikemia Russell, Bertha Clark, Linda Nunn, and Jane Doe, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Kenneth McGinnis, Joan Yukins, Sally Langley, Carol Howes, Robert Salis, Cornell Howard, Officer Portman, and Officer Robey, Defendants-Appellants, and

Officer Tate, Officer Ellison, and Officer Gallagher, Defendants.

Docket No. 198616.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Submitted September 4, 1997, at Grand Rapids.

Decided June 5, 1998, at 9:15 a.m.

Released for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API