Legal Opinion

Drouillard v. Stroh Brewery Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1995No. Docket Nos. 96422, 96423, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, C.J.

At issue in this appeal is the coordination of worker’s compensation and early pension benefits pursuant to MCL 418.354; MSA 17.237(354). In particular, plaintiffs contend that they were compelled to accept early payment of their retirement benefits and are therefore exempt from coordination of these benefits under MCL 418.354(l)(d); MSA 17.237(354)(l)(d). We hold that plaintiffs’ interpretation of this statutory provision is erroneous and that MCL 418.354(l)(d); MSA 17.237(354)(l)(d) does not preclude coordination where an employee is required to accept early pension benefits. We therefore…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dussia v. MONROE CTY. EMP. RET. SYS.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Dussia v. Monroe County Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Murphy v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Malonny v. MaharMichigan Supreme Court · 1847

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. FranciscoMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. DowdyMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Corl v. Huron Castings, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API