Dix v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Krueger, Judge.
The conviction is for theft; punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of seven years.
It appears from the record that in the early part of February, 1937, appellant appeared at the Union State Bank & Trust Company in the City of Laredo and applied for a loan of $10,000. He offered as collateral security twelve bonds in denominations of $1000 each which appeared to have been issued by the American Telegraph & Telephone Company of New York. He represented to Mr. P. H. Stanford, the Vice-President of the bank, that he was the owner of said bonds.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sherman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Hoovel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- De Blanc v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Contreras v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Dix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Bomar v. Insurors Indemnity & Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Bomar v. Insurors Indemnity & Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950