Legal Opinion

Dix v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1939No. 20162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Krueger, Judge.

The conviction is for theft; punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of seven years.

It appears from the record that in the early part of February, 1937, appellant appeared at the Union State Bank & Trust Company in the City of Laredo and applied for a loan of $10,000. He offered as collateral security twelve bonds in denominations of $1000 each which appeared to have been issued by the American Telegraph & Telephone Company of New York. He represented to Mr. P. H. Stanford, the Vice-President of the bank, that he was the owner of said bonds.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sherman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Hoovel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. De Blanc v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Contreras v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Dix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Bomar v. Insurors Indemnity & Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Bomar v. Insurors Indemnity & Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API