Legal Opinion

Sherman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1933No. 15948PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft by false pretext; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for six years.

The testimony of Mary L. Shepherd, the injured party, was, in substance, as follows: On October 8, 1931, appellant came to her home and told her that he was an investment broker and represented Corporate Trust Shares, a very large financial institution, and that he was president of a brokerage concern in Fort Worth. Appellant stated to her that he had learned from her banker that she owned a note for $1,000, which she had been *275unable to collect, and which apparently was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Deblanc v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Lawler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Fielder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Segal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hardeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. O'BRIEN v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Arnold v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2000
  5. Bomar v. Insurors Indemnity & InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API