Legal Opinion

Bomar v. Insurors Indemnity & Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 15, 1950No. 14296PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAMER, Justice.

Appellant, as insured, filed this action against appellee, as insurer, to recover the reasonable cash market value of a 1949 Pontiac automobile alleged to have been stolen from her while her automobile theft policy was in full force and effect. The trial was before the court without a jury and resulted in judgment for appellee insurer, from which judgment this appeal has 'been duly perfected. Appellant briefs two points, the first asserting error of the trial court in holding that “the taking of ‘Insured’s’ automobile by false pretext with attempt to appropriate it, and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Akers v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  2. Deblanc v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Segal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Security Ins. Co. v. Sellers-Sammons-Signor Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. De Blanc v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bomar v. Insurors Indemnity & InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Bomar v. Insurors Indemnity & Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API