Legal Opinion

Dix v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1941No. 21617PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Wilson County on a charge of unlawfully and fraudulently passing as true to P. H. Stanford a forged instrument. His punishment was assessed at five years in the penitentiary. The offense is alleged to have been committed in Webb County and the case was tried on a change of venue. This case was before this court in a former appeal on a question not raised at this time. 136 Texas Crim. Rep. 296, (124 S. W. (2d) 998.)

It is disclosed that appellant, who had. experience in another state both in the oil business and in operating a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mobley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Yelton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Dix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Tysinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Banner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Patrick Hugh Wayman v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API