Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Von Stoll
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1984No. 83-1144PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Von Stoll was convicted of two violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 and two of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. There are two major issues: (1) whether the conviction on Count I should be ’ reversed because the indictment charged that Von Stoll took $10,000 from one person, while the proof showed that he took it from that person’s business partner; and (2) whether the conviction on Count III should be reversed because it was based on Von Stoll’s confession without adequate corroborating evidence.
FACTS
Von Stoll’s convictions arose from his involvement in an advance fee scheme. He…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Paul Rowton BailleauxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- United States v. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Daniel J. LeichtnamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. F. Thomas Little, United States of America v. Peter Chernik, United States of America v. Harold GrutchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Jose P. FlorescaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. OlanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.